男性精神分裂症施行戒烟护理的方法及意义探究(1)
【摘要】 目的 探討男性精神分裂症施行戒烟护理的方法及意义。方法 98例男性精神分裂症患者， 根据数字表法随机分为对照组和观察组， 每组49例。对照组施行常规护理干预， 观察组在对照组基础上施行戒烟护理。比较两组患者的治疗效果；患者对吸烟危害性的认知程度、戒烟态度评分及吸烟数量；干预前后患者焦虑自评量表及抑郁自评量表评分。结果 对照组患者中治愈23例、有效17例、无效9例， 总有效率为81.63%；观察组患者中治愈30例、有效18例、无效1例， 总有效率为97.96%；观察组患者临床治疗总有效率明显高于对照组， 比较差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。干预前， 对照组患者焦虑自评量表、抑郁自评量表评分分别为(73.01±2.21)、(72.92±5.13)分， 观察组患者焦虑自评量表、抑郁自评量表评分分别为(73.24±2.13)、(72.03±5.55)分， 差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)；干预后， 观察组焦虑自评量表、抑郁自评量表评分分别为(21.13±0.22)、(32.26±0.51)分， 明显低于对照组的(52.47±0.69)、(53.45±0.25)分， 差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组患者对吸烟危害性的认知程度、戒烟态度评分(95.51±5.42)、(95.24±4.13)分优于对照组(82.49±2.02)、(80.42±3.01)分， 吸烟数量(5.62±1.44)支/d少于对照组(26.61±6.13)支/d， 差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 男性精神分裂症施行戒烟护理的效果确切， 可提高患者对吸烟危害性的认知， 遵医控制吸烟数量， 减轻患者焦虑、抑郁情绪， 值得推广应用。
【关键词】 男性精神分裂症；戒烟护理；方法；意义
DOI：10.14163/j.cnki.11-5547/r.2018.04.084
Investigation on the methods and significance of smoking cessation nursing in male schizophrenia YU Pin. Yingkou Mental Disease Hospital， Yingkou 115001， China
【Abstract】 Objective To discuss the methods and significance of smoking cessation nursing in male schizophrenia. Methods A total of 98 male schizophrenia patients were divided by random number table method into control group and observation group， with 49 cases in each group. The control group received conventional nursing intervention， and the observation group received smoking cessation nursing on the basis of the control group. Comparison were made on treatment effect， awareness of dangers of smoking， smoking cessation attitude scores and number of cigarettes， self-rating anxiety scale and self-rating depression scale score before and after intervention between two groups. Results The control group had 23 cured cases， 17 effective cases and
9 ineffective cases， with total effective rate as 81.63%， while the observation group had 30 cured cases，18 effective cases and 1 ineffective case， with total effective rate as 97.96%. The observation group had obviously higher total effective rate of clinical treatment than the control group， and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). Before intervention， the control group had self-rating anxiety scale and self-rating depression scale score respectively as (73.01±2.21) and (72.92±5.13) points， while the observation group had self-rating anxiety scale and self-rating depression scale score respectively as (73.24±2.13) and (72.03±5.55) points， and their difference was statistically significant (P>0.05). After intervention， the observation group had self-rating anxiety scale and self-rating depression scale score respectively as (21.13±0.22) and (32.26±0.51) points， which were all obviously lower than (52.47±0.69) and (53.45±0.25) points in the control group， and their difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). The observation group had better awareness of dangers of smoking and smoking cessation attitude scores as (95.51±5.42) and (95.24±4.13) points than (82.49±2.02) and (80.42±, 百拇医药(于品)
【关键词】 男性精神分裂症；戒烟护理；方法；意义
DOI：10.14163/j.cnki.11-5547/r.2018.04.084
Investigation on the methods and significance of smoking cessation nursing in male schizophrenia YU Pin. Yingkou Mental Disease Hospital， Yingkou 115001， China
【Abstract】 Objective To discuss the methods and significance of smoking cessation nursing in male schizophrenia. Methods A total of 98 male schizophrenia patients were divided by random number table method into control group and observation group， with 49 cases in each group. The control group received conventional nursing intervention， and the observation group received smoking cessation nursing on the basis of the control group. Comparison were made on treatment effect， awareness of dangers of smoking， smoking cessation attitude scores and number of cigarettes， self-rating anxiety scale and self-rating depression scale score before and after intervention between two groups. Results The control group had 23 cured cases， 17 effective cases and
9 ineffective cases， with total effective rate as 81.63%， while the observation group had 30 cured cases，18 effective cases and 1 ineffective case， with total effective rate as 97.96%. The observation group had obviously higher total effective rate of clinical treatment than the control group， and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). Before intervention， the control group had self-rating anxiety scale and self-rating depression scale score respectively as (73.01±2.21) and (72.92±5.13) points， while the observation group had self-rating anxiety scale and self-rating depression scale score respectively as (73.24±2.13) and (72.03±5.55) points， and their difference was statistically significant (P>0.05). After intervention， the observation group had self-rating anxiety scale and self-rating depression scale score respectively as (21.13±0.22) and (32.26±0.51) points， which were all obviously lower than (52.47±0.69) and (53.45±0.25) points in the control group， and their difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). The observation group had better awareness of dangers of smoking and smoking cessation attitude scores as (95.51±5.42) and (95.24±4.13) points than (82.49±2.02) and (80.42±, 百拇医药(于品)